Listening to consumers can be cheap marketing

Imagine for a moment that you are a brand manager in this current uncertain economic time.   It’s pretty unlikely that your budget has been raised for 2009.  Things are looking pretty down.  How can you do anything right now?

Part of the answer is to think like small business or startup.  Use resources that are cheap or free that can still tell you about what people think of your produce.

Go to google or yahoo.  Search for your brand and the word “sucks.”  Compare that to your competitors.  “McDonalds Sucks” gives 1.77M pages, while “Burger king sucks“  delivers about 700K.  Your detractors may not be eloquent, but its likely thay have something interesting to say and have taken the time to do so in a very public forum.  If you find one or two insights out of a search engine tour, you’ve just saved the $50K you might have spent on a formal market research report to tell you the same thing.

I will say it takes a bit of a strong stomach to endure the vitriol of so many angry customers, but in the end it will make you and your brand better in the long run.

Posted in branding | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

Do dancing people deliver better click through?

We’ve all seen the ads on seemingly every web page on the Internet.  They feature some random person dancing amid talk of interest rates and refinancing.  At times it seems to be video, other times it’s animation.  

I’ll leave out the company, but lets say their initials are lmb.  As a business model they do second mortgages and other refinancing.  One could normally consider them to be a sub prime broker or lender.  

Given the general malaise in the market and the central issue being loose lending practices, there’s all kinds of cognitive dissonance going on with these ads.  However, I’ve seen variants of them for months if not years, and I see them with amazing frequency.  Most recently they are making heavy rotation on my financial news of choice, cnbc.com

Let’s get in the head of the average consumer, or at least make some guesses.  I’m checking out the latest in the dow, and recently watching it decline precipitously.  I’ve heard over and over again that credit is getting tighter.  And there it is, some one dancing off to the side of the page.  Next to the dancing person there’s some heavy copy about refinancing and bush approving a housing bill.  They offer for me to calculate a new house payment.  Only in the smallest grey type do I see the advertiser’s brand.  

Sure it makes no sense, and it might violate every rule of advertising.  They are combining 3 different messages in a way that is not very appealing or clear.  There’s no clear offer.  The dancing people have little to do with anything, and are obviously there just to garner attention.  The brand is nearly invisible.  On the other hand I have to conclude that it works, at least to get people to come to their site, because they keep doing the same basic ad.  They must garner enough attention, and pique the curiosity of their target enough to get that elusive click.  Or perhaps their business model is lucrative enough to pay for absurd numbers of impressions.  Whatever it is, in this era of data, something has to be working right?

i have to admit that I hope not.  It in many ways it is the opposite of showing respect for the consumer.  Maybe the average advertiser can learn from the motion used, as it might really help you get noticed among a largely static webpage.

Posted in mass media | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Facebook changes alter rules for viral apps

Facebook and MySpace have been one of the epicenters for viral mini programs known as apps or widgets.  The functionality for these programs varies from one time challenges issued to your friends online, to complicated interactive games.  Some are mere decorations while others are massive organizers for important personal information.  In some of the best cases, your functionality in the app depended on the size of your network and the number of your friends which installed it.  Many have had millions of instaills, like Slide’s Funspace, or Pieces of Flair by rockyou.  Millions have had very few installs, however.

More often than not, the viral nature worked simply.  You install the app, everyone that you are friends with becomes aware of the install through your newsfeed or direct invites, and it becomes an innocuous part of a persons profile.  Every time a user visits his or her profile, the small frame of the app becomes an active user.

Recently, the controversial facebook redesign has made apps far less prominent.  They now have been relegated to the “boxes” tab on a users profile, forcing a user to actively engage.   It would seem as if this has caused traffic to many apps to plummet dramatically.  The reverse is true for a few.  Estimated app valuations have also apparetly plummeted as well.

It seems as if the second stage for apps has begun.  Its no longer going to be enough to follow the viral strategy 101 and just push for installs.  App makers will need to build apps that are engaging, not merely virally marketed well.

Posted in Viral, buzz | Leave a comment

Nintendo breaks a wall online, creates a remarkable ad

Lets just admit it, so much information is in front of any of us on a given day that its getting harder to impress and create remarkable ads.  The Super Bowl spectacle every years is often the lone place where the average individual goes to seek out a commercial.  With the exception of Apple and maybe a few Bud Light commericals, not to many get talked about at the water cooler anymore.

Leave it to Nintendo to break every other rule and create an ad that people will seek out.  Using the now familiar idiom of leaked footage of a new game uploaded to youtube, they continue to make the video break out of the frame to make the entire web browser appear to be broken apart by the rough game play.  It delivers a message that illustrates the uniqueness of the game in a way that’s very easy to understand. 

How effective has it been?  As of this writing about 12 days after it posted, over 2.3M views have been logged.  Pretty amazing for something that is nothing more than an ad.

Posted in Viral, branding, buzz | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

User Created Videos to show common interests

Last year a video prognosticator, Kige Ramsey, got his 15 minutes of fame when he correctly predicted every game for the first weekend.  Dallas radio, in particular picked him up for interviews.  Deadspin nominated him for their youtube hall of fame.  Numerous others followed putting up videos of their NFL picks, but none could match the great Kige.  He, in turn, started to post his opinions on everything, from Nicole Ritchie to relationship advice.

After seeing the success of these efforts, Circuit City launched their FANALYSTS’s Channel.  The sponsored channel encourages users to upload fantasy football analysts to upload videos which are hand selected for inclusion on the channel.  There is no hard sell for Circuit City, but there’s lots of their logo everywhere.  Much in the tradition of Kige, the videos frequently diverge from football to broader pop culture like Heroes and politics.

I’ll give credit to Circuit City for being a part of a “movment” instead of trying to invent thier own.  By demonstrating their understanding and providing a launching pad for content generators, they are trying to get ahead of their rival.   The traction isn’t great thus far, but I think it’s a nice use of user generated content.

Posted in Participation, branding, buzz | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Search for branding

Using internet search is pretty obvious for transactional companies.  If you sell flat screen TVs online, you buy key words like “Sony Plasma TV” and optimize your site for natural traffic.  Once the user enters the site, they could be on the exact product they intend to purchase.  

However, for traditional brand companies the linkage is a bit harder.  Generally speaking, search engines aren’t used to look for low involvement products like potato chips or cleaning products.  Brand marketers are used to metrics like reach, frequency, recall and brand awareness.  Search uses things like clickthru and total impressions.  How does one translate the metrics?

This was the topic discussed at a panel at Advertising Week.  The bottom line for me is the inherent differences in the media and campaigns.  Search is active.  Old media is passive.  One is pull, the other push.  

There’s a great value in search for brands if they think about the mentality of a searcher.   People are unlikely to search for Tide, but they might search for cleaning tips.  The top sponsored listing when I completed this search was for Tide.  By providing this information for the searcher they present themselves as the expert on the topic.  It’s not selling product at that very moment, but it will sell it in the future, just like typical TV ads.

Key words that are being used can be seen as well.  This can be seen by using google trends or other keyword tools.  Used well, it can reveal patterns that would otherwise be unnoticed, as a sort of outside in market research.

A quick look at the google zeitgeist can be pretty informative.  Take this example from Sept 22.  #36 is “bank of america website down” as people tried to access the site when it was down for five hours during the working day.  Even worse given the general financial malaise going on currently.  This might have been an opportunity for competitors, or news organizations to fill in the gap of information.  Today’s #35 search is for coldstone creamery.  Apparently they are giving away free ice cream this evening, so its presence is indicative of the effectiveness of their campaign.

Posted in branding | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Your receptionist is part of your brand too

A couple of experiences over the last couple of days have reminded me of the need to have every touchpoint reflect your brand.  In particular that includes your receptionist.  In many cases this person is the first impression a potential customer will have with actual people at your business.

At the newspaper, our receptionist was not very friendly, even to employees.  However she was very efficient at screening individuals and visitors to make sure they are in the right place.  For a business like a newspaper that could have any number of people approach with less than pure intentions, she was the right choice.

However, if you are in the business of pleasing customers in your place of business a completely different approach is important.  I recently needed service on my car after a belt broke.  When we called to schedule an appointment with service the first person that we talked to was the dealerships receptionist.  She was unfriendly to the point of being rude, but at least she could connect us to the service department’s voice mail.

We left a message and had our car dropped off in the morning.  The service department did everything right.  We had our car repaired very quickly, for less than we had expected, and they told us we could pick up our car after the service department had closed.

We arrived around 7:30, straight from work with two kids in the car.  The sales people on the floor acted as if we were asking for a miracle to retrieve our car.  But at least they seemed sort of willing to help.  Then we saw our friend the receptionist.  She curtly reminded me that the service department closed at 6:00.  In the sort of tone that let me know that I was clearly an idiot.  She also told me that the two departments (sales and service) were different businesses.  Eventually the sales people found my keys and ran my credit card to have me pay.  I was certain they had done it several times before, but they made me feel like they had done me a favor.

Here’s my criticism of the dealership.  To me, the customer, there is only one dealership.  If I wanted I could very easily take my car to an independent repair shop.  Even if they run to a different P and L, to the customer service department and sales are the same.  It’s pretty likely that I’ve chosen to pay the higher price a the dealership because I believe that I will get better service.

Second.  If the receptionist is there to bridge the gap between the two sides of the dealership she should be empowered to do so.  It would have taken her just as much time and effort to express sympathy and concern as her consternation for my daring to show up after hours and expect my car.   Even though the service department had told me it wasn’t an issue and they did it all the time.

Third.  I know that sales people don’t make money helping people for service.  Not directly at least.  I was the only soul in the place and that was apparent to me.  They could help me or surf the Internet for the next 20 minutes.  Only one of those two has any chance of a future sale.  Their obvious lack of consideration for the long term ramifications of treating me like I was bothering them made me far less likely to be that purchaser.  If they did their homework they would have realized that I have owned three cars by this same manufacturer, and this one was about 7 years old.  It just had some sort of problem, so it’s pretty likely that I’m at least beginning to consider what my next car will be.  They missed a golden opportunity to leave me with a positive impression for a future sale.

The brand in this case is the sum of the experience.  I’ve been very happy with my car.  The service department performed quite well.  The receptionist and sales department’s condescending attitudes and general snobbishness left me with such a bad taste that its quite likely that I’ll stop with this brand at 3, as they are by far the nearest dealer.  Two in the pro column and two in the con isn’t likely to engender loyalty.

The brand in this case is Subaru.  The type of quirky brand that needs good word of mouth to succeed.  The tow truck driver had never driven one, and was impressed by how nice it was, to illustrate my point.  They have had it in the past with reliable cars that fill unique needs.  They lost it for me this week with a rude receptionist and shortsighted salespeople.

Posted in branding | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Seinfeld out for Microsoft? Who cares – Look at the buzz

Only a few weeks into the new campagn, Microsoft has pulled the plug on pitchman Jerry Seinfeld.  According to Microsoft, the move was planned from the beginning.  Given the amount of time that it takes to shoot a commercial and the fact they apparently have a new one set to debut this week, it is fairly believable.

My interest here is the sheer amount of conversation this move has created.  I’m not sure if Crispin Porter + Bogusky is that brilliant, but they did claim from the beginning they were trying to get people to talk about windows and the campaign.  That has most certainly been achieved.  The two million video views on youtube, as noted in my prior post, is pretty strong evidence.

What I remain puzzled by is such moves have created a negative buzz.  The old rule of PR was: “I don’t care what they say, just make sure they spell the name right” but I can’t believe it applies in this case.  Also if as rumored they are going straight after the much beloved Mac/PC ads, they are certain to encounter an even bigger storm of negativity.  

However, the person that really needs to be convinced is not the online elitist, but an “average” consumer who doesn’t write blogs or get as involved in advertising and marketing as some others.  Is the bewilderment over the first couple of ads real for them, or did they just enjoy watching Seinfeld again?  Did people start to change their opinion of Microsoft after seeing some commercials that were nearly completely unrelated to actual products?  Will they even attribute those few vignettes to Microsoft at all?  My guess is most people somewhat enjoyed the commercials and shifted their opinion every so slightly positively for Microsoft.  It’s nudging a battle ship, but still an ever so slight move in the right direction.  

There’s still a big risk to this approach, and according to most the effort has been very expensive.  Microsoft is attacking a huge strategic problem of a bad corporate image in a very unusual way, but with an impressive and patient approach.

Posted in buzz, mass media | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Microsoft and Seinfeld – An ad campaign about nothing?

Microsoft recently debuted a new ad campaign aimed at revising their image to be more friendly and approachable.  To do so, they employed Jerry Seinfeld for a purported $10M.  The first installment in the campaign debuted along with the regular season of NFL football and left many wondering what the point was.  The spot, featured below, showed Jerry and Bill meeting in a shoe store and ended with Jerry wondering if Bill could make computers more delicious.  Up until the end, I thought it was a commercial for American Express, especially when the mention was made of the shoe carnival points.   The spot was an impressive 1:30, but really didn’t say anything at all.

The second installment debuted on microsoft, and was quickly ported over to youtube (by microsoft themselves).  This video is over four minutes long and reveals a bit more about the reason behind the campaign.  Windows wants to connect with real people.  To do so they employed two extraordinary wealthy individuals and “embedded” them into a normal family.  Again, the feature has very little about computers.  However, this one is pretty funny, despite being a bit confusing.

There are a number of very interesting things here.  The second commercial (more accuratly a webisode) tells you exactly what the first was trying to accomplish.  It’s so above board about it, that you can’t help but respect that Microsoft realizes they have a very serious image problem.

Continue reading

Posted in Viral, buzz, mass media | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Firefox 3 as viral launch

The web browser Firefox 3 (of which I am a proud user), had what can only be called an amazing launch.  They set the world record for downloads of software on a single day, despite plenty of reports of errors during the launch, such as late start.  They ran two very important websites, www.getfirefox.com and www.spreadfirefox.com.  Spread firefox was the center for the marketing, and get was the call to action. Firefox is a very well reviewed browser, no doubt, but software like this is a standards and network game, meaning that the value of the software increases as more people have the software.  There were important considerations to having as many people have the software as quickly as possible, and they knocked it out of the park.  Over 8 million people downloaded the software in a single day.

The secret is: there was no prior world record for software downloads.  Firefox invented it.  The strategy was amazing.  The press and bloggers wanted to cover it, and users had an incentive to download it as quickly as possible.  They were able to multiply the visiblity of the launch many times over traditional marketing.

They also involved the existing community quite well.  As far as grassroots efforts go, they made it easy by having toolkits for the “faithful” to spread the word.

Firefox also added an element of pride.  Downloaders could print certificates for their particpation in the occasion.

From every aspect, the launch was an amazing use of publicty and community involvment.  I applaud them for setting the record they created…  and acheiving a very critical strategic goal with their innovative marketing.  They got beyond the functional improvements of the browser and made it an event to get a new piece of software.

Posted in Events, Participation, Viral | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment